The Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC) is an 8-point clinical decision rule designed to identify patients in whom the suspicion of pulmonary embolism is so low that diagnostic testing (like D-dimer or CT pulmonary angiography) will do more harm than good.
The Problem with Over-Testing
Testing for PE has increased dramatically, largely due to the availability of CT angiography. However, testing carries risks: false-positive D-dimers lead to unnecessary radiation exposure from CTs, contrast-induced nephropathy, and the over-diagnosis of sub-segmental PEs that may not require anticoagulation. PERC helps halt this cascade in very low-risk patients.
The 8 Criteria
A patient is PERC negative (and thus PE is ruled out clinically) only if they meet ALL of the following:
- Age < 50 years
- Heart rate < 100 beats per minute
- Room air oxygen saturation ≥ 95%
- No prior history of DVT or PE
- No recent trauma or surgery requiring hospitalization (within 4 weeks)
- No hemoptysis (coughing up blood)
- No exogenous estrogen use (e.g., oral contraceptives, hormone replacement)
- No unilateral leg swelling
PERC Negative = (Age < 50) AND (HR < 100) AND (O2 >= 95%) AND (No Hemoptysis) AND (No Estrogen) AND (No Prior DVT/PE) AND (No Surgery/Trauma) AND (No unilateral leg swelling).
The Crucial Prerequisite: Pre-Test Probability
The most common mistake when using PERC is applying it to the wrong patient. PERC is a "step-down" rule. It must only be applied to patients whose pre-test probability is already assessed as low (often defined as <15% gestalt). If you think a patient is highly likely to have a PE, PERC cannot rule it out.